The defense training available at Front Sight is so thorough that
they even cover what one should expect after surviving an attempt upon
your life and well-being. There are two other "problems" that we must
face and either endure or overcome. They are possible criminal and
civil liability.
Emotionally, we can expect elation or joy at being alive after the
attack is over. We might later regret what happened, especially if we
had to cause serious injury, and that injury led to the death of an
assailant. This regret can be especially powerful for a Christian who
understands the implications of dying with unrepented sin. It means
that someone has reached the end of his time of grace, and will be found
lacking on the day of Judgment. That person is already subjected to
suffering in the place of torment prepared for the demons, and will
suffer there eternally. By contrast, as a Christian, you would be
prepared to die in the certainty of Jesus' mercy, and God's promise of
eternal life. Regret can lead to anger and doubt, and when dealing with
the social consequences of surviving the battle, to fear and panic.
Those emotions are not a beneficial combination when encountering
"problems two and three."
The lecture at Front Sight comes from a secular perspective, which is
somewhat different from a Christian perspective. It bids us to remember
that survival is the most important thing, so that whatever difficulty
may come as a result of the deadly encounter is of secondary importance.
We should try to retain the joy of still being alive, as we undergo the
hardships of dealing with possible criminal and civil liability. You
have to be alive first in order to deal with those things, and death is
the worst alternative. That's the temporal, secular perspective.
The eternal, Christian perspective is a bit different, because
Christians are in the business of being prepared for death, and want
their neighbors to be prepared for it too. We know that the consequence
of being unprepared for death is worse than the death of one who is
already prepared. As a result, we may be quite willing to die rather
than have another person face the certainty of everlasting punishment.
Hence, a Christian's sense of regret and even guilt in the aftermath of
a self defense situation may be quite strong. God has provided a way to
deal with that in the gift of absolution, or the forgiveness pronounced
upon the strength of Jesus' atoning death. However, a wise Christian
will also try to obtain an accurate perspective before the encounter
takes place.
When confronted with an assailant, you will not be inside his head. The
best assumption is that he has no regard or respect for your life,
well-being, or property, nor any regard or respect for anyone who may be
with or near you. You don't know what his goal is. It may be to enrich
himself, to prove a point, to obtain some pleasure, or any number of
other things. However, when you recognize his threat to you and your
neighbors' life and property, you can be sure that he intends to harm.
Likely, his intent to harm includes a willingness, and perhaps even a
desire, to take a life. Those who are morally bound by the Law or by
concern for the eternal well-being of our neighbors are placed at a
disadvantage, because we are inclined to regard the assailant as one of
our neighbors. He has no care for us, but we are inclined to care for
him.
It is important to understand that Christians are responsible not only
to do what we might for the eternal well-being of an assailant, but also
to care for all our other neighbors too. That includes our spouse, our
children, our parents, fellow students or colleagues, and any other
associates. In fact, it also includes ourselves. Every one of them
will be somewhere for eternity, and we should be concerned about them as
much as about our assailant. Should the time of grace end for any of
them, it is just as serious as for the assailant. We may be able to
say, "I am ready to enter heaven this instant," but can we say the same
for anyone else?
It is also important to understand that using deadly force in self
defense is quite a different thing from trying to kill someone, and also
quite different from having no regard for the life of another person.
In defending against an attack, we may use violence in a way that
injures the assailant, but the intent is only to stop the attack, and
the violence should be calculated to do that in the most effective way,
preferably without killing the assailant. That is only possible with
serious skills and mental preparation. If the defense uses a firearm,
for example, the recommended action is to place a controlled pair of
shots into the thoracic cavity of the assailant. At Front Sight, we
learned that this will almost always stop the fight, and that 80% of the
time, the assailant will still live to receive medical treatment. Of
those who do, 80% of them will recover with no lasting physical
consequences.
So the application of deadly or violent force in self defense is not
necessarily the end of an assailant's time of grace. If done with
sufficient forethought and skill, and with God's blessing, it will
only end the attack, and will provide an opportunity for the assailant
to repent and receive the blessing of faith before death. It will also
protect all the potential victims from having their own time of grace
cut short by someone who has no regard for their lives or well-being.
It's still possible that someone may die, but that's not much different
from dealing with other deadly forces that many of us encounter on a
daily or weekly basis. "There but by the grace of God go I."
All of these considerations should help a Christian to deal with the
challenges that arise in the aftermath of a defensive action. They
should help us to reason our way through the emotional reflexes, and to
trust that God's gracious presence is still with us. Also, remember
that there will likely be a sense of guilt. That's why God has given us
private confession and absolution, as well as the rich table of
forgiveness set weekly in the Divine Service.
Immediately after the use of deadly force, we should secure the area
from other possible threats and call the authorities. We don't need to
be evasive about our part in what has happened, because we have been
careful to use deadly force only when it was reasonably justified. Just
speak the truth. Then, comply with law enforcement, remembering that
they can't read your mind to know whether your intentions are good or
bad. Be courteously helpful to the investigation by pointing out
witnesses that might be interviewed before you give a statement. Then,
ask the officer ready to take your statement if he has any intention of
charging you with a crime or arresting you. If he indicates that this
is his intention, then is the time to courteously invoke your right to
remain silent. It's not that you have anything to hide, but the
problems of legal and civil liability are such that the innocent are
sometimes made to suffer and pay as though they were guilty of
something. Justice is often not completely just.
If you will be charged or investigated for a crime, you will want an
attorney who can help you best. That's not a criminal attorney, who is
more accustomed to plea barganing for clients who have committed crimes.
It's not a superstar defender of famous personalities, who has become
notorious with the District Attorney and the justice system. It's
someone who has a track record of working with the DA, and may even be
acquainted with him on a personal level. Once you have such an
attorney, let him guide you in all public statements or discussions you
may have about the case.
Criminal liability depends first upon your own actions, but it also
depends upon decisions made by law enforcement, investigators, the
justice system, and finally, a jury of those peers who would rather not
be there, but could not get out of the obligation. From outside that
system, we can logically consider whether someone has broken the law as
a black and white question. Once the wheels of justice are turning,
however, it's quite possible for the conclusion to end up being
factually wrong, so that "justice" is really an injustice. That's why
there are appeals, at least for those with the money to afford them. If
that's a sobering thought, remember Joseph's example, and that God had a
plan for him even through years of unjust punishment and imprisonment.
The other problem is civil liability. If you were to lose a criminal
case (justly or not), you would likely also face civil liability toward
the family of the assailant. In fact, you might face a civil case even
if you win the criminal case. Such is the fallen world we live in.
Again, remember the example of Joseph, and even Job. Remember those
examples now, before the time comes when you might have to use deadly
force in self-defense. The best possible outcome of self defense is
when you get to keep what you had to begin with. As a Christian, I'd
add that the best possible outcome would also include your assailant and
all his potential victims surviving to receive God's gift of
forgiveness, faith, and eternal life.
Recent Comments